I. What is sociolinguistics?
Concerned with things that vary (most ling
classes you'll take are concerned with the things that don't vary about
language)
All levels of the language can
show variation -
sounds, words, meanings, grammar
Variation can be seen at the level
of the individual or the group
so an individual's use of language varies from place to place, audience to
audience and one group of speakers shows language differences when compared to
another group of speakers.
Everyone speaks a dialect - your age, gender,
race, ethnicity, social class, geographic background, etc. all contribute to
make up your dialect
Some examples of variation to test with the
class:
sound: often, coupon, data
lexicon: sneaker/gym shoe/tennis shoe; firefly/lightening bug
meaning: barbecue
grammar: positive anymore "the weather's so hot anymore"
II. Background on
sociolinguistics (sometimes
known as social dialectology)
Stems from the study of regional dialects.
response to concerns of theoretical linguistics:
Saussure's langue (grammatical
system - homogeneous) vs. parole (social
uses of language - heterogeneous); (Chomsky's competence vs. performance)
Linguistic theory concerned with ideal
speaker-listener, in a completely
homogeneous speech
community : an idealization to allow analysis to take
place.
But then what to do with this variation?
Is it just random - free variation?
Where does this variation really come from and what purpose does it serve?
III. Reasons for variation in
language
SOCIOHISTORICAL factors
LINGUISTIC factors
Language constantly changing for many reasons. No language ever stagnant,
whether we're talking about vocabulary, syntax, pronunciation.
So we've got all these dialects. Now how do we
categorize them?
dialectology concerned
with finding regional variation - old farmer, quaint
connotations
But in late 1960's urban popluation growing,
and there was
an increasing need to describe & analyze speech of urban populations
fully
and accurately. lack of HOMOGENEITY in
urban environments, unlike areas
typically of interest to dialectology. this lack of homogeneity led many
to clain it's FREE VARIATION -
random, not patterned.
But some (starting with William Labov) argued
that this variation displayed ordered
heterogeneity instead of random
chaos. Labov set out to study this variation systematically - what is
behind the variation?
IV. Some important concepts
Notion of SPEECH COMMUNITY:
community of people in which the rules for the
conduct & interpretation of at least one linguistic variety
(language/dialect) are shared:
i.e., shared norms for language use (can be a city,
neighborhood, region, nation)
Shared communicative
competence - what a speaker needs to
know to communicate effectively in cultural settings
Can
a speech community still be said to exist if it shows the kind of heterogeneity
that
a city like NYC shows?
Concept
of a linguistic variable:
a linguistic item with identifiable
variants (in/ing; ae); the dependent variable
sociolinguistic
variable: a linguistic feature which
correlates with some
non-linguistic independent variable of social context: of the speaker,
addressee, audience, setting, etc. so social variables like age, gender,
race, style. (social characteristics are the independent variables)
So
the goal of urban/social dialectology (sociolinguistics) becomes the correlation
of social and linguistic traits, and the explanation of why things correlate in
this way. (Sociolinguistics seeks to demonstrate patterned
covariation vs. free variation)
V. Branches of
sociolinguistics
Can be defined broadly or narrowly -
Broad: branch of linguistics studying those properties of language which
require reference to social, including contextual, factors in their
explanation
Narrow: seeks to explain patterend covariation of language and society;
seeks rules to account for that variation.
Some
traditions of sociolinguistic investigation:
- linguistic
variation (sociolinguistics proper): focuses
on the linguistic variable that correlates with social differences.
Unit of study is language itself. Considered a part of
linguistics. Biggest proponent - Labov.
- ethnography
of speaking: emphasis on various aspects of context
that are involved in differing interpretations of language use. Unit
of analysis is not language itself but rather the users of language: the
speech community. Generally considered part of sociology or
anthropology. Proponent - Dell Hymes.
- language
planning (also applied sociolinguistics, sociology of language):
emphasis on practical aspects of this study. Much about
language contact issues and language use in education.
For all these branches of
sociolinguistics, awareness that variation exists on the group level as
well as on the individual level.
For the individual, a whole set
of linguistic resources -
Linguistic repertoire: a
person's (or community's) linguistic resources. For an individual, depends on
social history & social networks.
Parts of this repertoire include:
Vernacular:
the most basic, earliest learned variety of language. It is the least subject
to self-monitoring and the least likely to change over one's lifetime.
Superposed varieties: later-learned
varieties of speech. Used in more formal settings.
The vernacular comes out in certain
circumstances - when someone is tired, upset, around other speakers of the
vernacular, very informal settings...
A goal of sociolinguistics is to
understand this vernacular. But to do this we must
examine speech in natural settings, not artificial ones. But how do we get at
this kind of speech?
Observer's paradox: the
speech we most want to observe is unobserved speech. We have to come up
with techniques for overcoming this.
0 comments:
Post a Comment